Study Guide: Explorers, or boys messing about? - Steven Morris

"Explorers or boys messing about?" by Steven Morris

 IGCSE English Language Part 1: Unit Section A Non-fiction texts 

A complete breakdown of "Explorers or boys messing about?" by Steven Morris (The Guardian, 2003) - for Pearson Edexcel International GCSE English Language Part 1: Unit 1 Section A Non-fiction texts. Includes summary, themes, techniques, sample exam-style answers, and revision tips.



Context

  • This is a newspaper article from The Guardian, written in 2003.

  • It reports on a real-life incident in which two adventurers, Steve Brooks and Quentin Smith, had to be rescued from a failed Arctic expedition.

  • The tone is subtly mocking, questioning whether their actions were heroic or simply reckless.

  • Audience: the general public; particularly those interested in current affairs or exploration.

  • Purpose: to inform, but also to provoke debate and subtly critique the explorers.


Key Themes & Ideas

  • Irresponsibility vs. heroism

  • Public resources and who deserves them

  • Masculinity and adventure culture

  • The fine line between bravery and foolishness


Tone & Writer’s Attitude

  • Ironically detached - Morris subtly ridicules the men rather than directly criticising them.

  • The tone suggests scepticism toward the idea of modern explorers as heroes.

  • There’s underlying frustration about the misuse of public money and resources.


Language Techniques

  • Loaded language: The title itself - “Explorers or boys messing about?” - implies immaturity.

  • Quoting experts sarcastically: E.g., “One Antarctic explorer told Mr Brooks he was ‘a clown’.”

  • Diction: Describing the rescue as involving “the Royal Navy, the RAF, and British coastguards” highlights the scale and cost of the response.

  • Emotive language: Highlights their “wife in distress” and the “high drama” to tug at the reader's emotions.

  • Contrast: The explorers’ high-tech equipment (satellite phones, emergency beacons) is contrasted with the foolishness of their plan, creating dramatic irony.


Structure & Organisation

  • Begins with the rescue to create immediate tension and draw in readers.

  • Moves to criticism and expert opinions to add weight to the argument.

  • Ends with a factual recount of who the men are - but presented in a way that leaves the reader questioning their competence.

  • Short, punchy paragraphs make the article readable and tabloid-like in rhythm.


Evaluation & Reader Impact

  • Morris shapes our view of the men as irresponsible through selective detail and ironic tone.

  • The article is persuasive but disguised as neutral reporting.

  • Readers are likely to feel frustration or amusement - but also to question the line between bravery and stupidity.



Next Post: Tips for exam analysis and sample exam responses.

Comments

  1. Thank You So much!
    This helped me so much...
    :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. thank you so much i can finally understand this.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Don't you think that there should be more annotations? I'm not criticizing your notes, I know that it's a pain to type them all. Nobody's going to get full marks with just 10 annotations. I have about 32 myself, here's the link: https://www.scribd.com/document/374248295/Explorers-or-Boys-Messing-About

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much - could you upload the other extracts please?

      Delete
    2. This man is quite helpful

      Delete
    3. ^the person bove me sucks his .....

      Delete
  4. It's very useful. Helped a lot. Thank you for this

    ReplyDelete
  5. what is the meaning of Mr.Smith also known as Q? i really need to know the answer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Q is a fictional character from James Bond, so the reference shows he’s childish

      Delete
  6. how does the writer present mr brooks and mr steed from the passage of boys missing

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Study Guide: The Explorer's Daughter - Kari Herbert